If it were possible to fill every job vacancy available
there would still be people without a job.
How will those people support themselves? Social Democrats suggest that the wealth of
the working and just clearly rich, be spread around to feed and clothe those
without a visible source of income. Capitalists
see no reason why the poor shouldn’t just starve or freeze to death. Puritans see riches that one controls as sign
of divine grace and starving and freezing to death proof of moral error. Protestant ethic declares that riches are a
matter of predestination. But none of
this addresses the problem of more people than jobs. If there were more jobs than people the
discussion would be different. Until
someone comes up with a way to create jobs out of thin air the only solution to
the ‘more people than jobs’ conundrum is to reduce the population. Limiting the number of children a couple can
have didn’t turn out well in China. And
now they have upped it to two but I still don’t think they have it rite. Until it becomes the socially responsible
thing to do to have no children I don’t see the Earth’s population decreasing.
Capitalists see no reason to shrink the pool of working
poor who take their underpaid jobs and put pressure on all of us to work for
less. The problems of the poor are not capitalists’
problems and hunger induces workers to withstand otherwise intolerable
conditions for unconscionably low compensation.
No comments:
Post a Comment