Tuesday, November 11, 2014

We ain't so smart

Much like the difference between the linear processing used by a computer and the, let’s say ‘holographic’ thought process of the human brain, which has kept computers from out ‘thinking’, read that as processing if you like, us and kept us from having to recognize robots and their computer brains as anything close to human.  The Aliens that have the ability to get to Earth have no reason to recognize us until we get our physics together.  We know a lot about our physical world but a unified theory of physics isn't even on the horizon.  In comparison to alien life forms that have the ability to travel between galaxies we are in physics infancy.  It seems obvious to me that there is a level of physics understanding that has so far alluded us.

The interstellar Aliens may be keeping an eye on us but they probably don’t have to.  Once we figure out physics, come up with the unified theory and start inter galactic travel, it will be obvious that we have ‘come of age’. 


And there is no reason for aliens to ‘take over the Earth’ when there are millions, if not billions of unpopulated, habitable planets out there, for adventurous Aliens that have mastered intergalactic travel, that don’t have the pollution problems they find here.

If we end up killing ourselves off they may wonder down to pick through the rubble, but I doubt it.  ‘There’s nothing to see here folks.  Now just move along.’

Friday, September 5, 2014

Advise

Do not invest in the installation of mega electronics projects, because by the time they are completed they will be obsolete.

Instead invest in small tools that accomplish big things because they are very rare.  In general it takes big tools to accomplish big things.

If you don't like the way something is done search for small tools.

Sunday, April 6, 2014

Metaphor

I have been reading "A Kierkegaard Anthology" edited by Robert Bretall.  It's just bits and pieces of stuff SK wrote, put more or less in chronological order, but it is an easy way for me to get a feel for what SK thought.

One selection in the anthology is titled 'Purity of Heart' and in it SK writes: 

"When a man meets his death by drowning, as he sinks, without being quite dead he comes to the surface again.  At last a bubble comes out of his mouth.  When this has happened, then he sinks, dead.  That bubble was the last breath, the last supply of air that could make him lighter than the sea.  So with that remark.  In that remark the last hope of salvation expired.  In that last remark he gave himself up."  

And in the next paragraph he continues:

"But this coolness is still more horrible: that, in the anxiety of death, a man should not cry out for help, "I am going under, save me"; but that he should quietly choose to be a witness to his own destruction!"

I was struck both by how SK described death without salvation and his amazement that it happens.  It seems to haunt him.

I hope you enjoyed my selection.

Thursday, March 27, 2014

What If

What if there were no humans, no belief in the infinite, no passion?   Would god exist?  Is belief in god, god’s existence?  Does god exist because someone believes, because someone prays?  Is god’s existence merely subjective faith?  What does the existence of humankind mean to god?

Or is there an objective god and if so what purpose does faith serve?  It seems to me that if there is an objective, all powerful god which created everything, such a god would have had to have been here before time began and surely it would also have to continue to be here once time ends.  An objective, all powerful god should know everything, all that has ever been and all that will ever be.  Or is the objective god limited, evolving, just a more advanced expression of humanity?  And in all that this objective god knows, are there multiple outcomes for my life?  If so, this could mean that there are more outcomes than can be imagined by my, or any other comparably puny human mind.  Or does the objective god only know the one outcome of each life.  Is the single fate of every tree, every dog, every grain of sand, known?  What if your prayers do not amend the outcome of your life?  And if there is an objective god why is faith even an issue?  Why wouldn’t an objective god make itself known and stop sectarian violence?

If there is only one outcome for each life, why pray?  If you pray, you believe in free will and the power of prayer to influence the future.  If there is only one outcome for each life, is prayer merely an avowal of faith to a subjective god?  And if prayer is merely an avowal of faith in a subjective god, doesn’t god already know whether or not you believe and nothing is gained by prayer?  I understand why it is written that praying to a false idle is condemned but I don’t understand why ‘not praying at all’ is also condemned.  Is it because if no one prays, believes, has faith, god ceases to exist?

What if humans, as the only fully rational and self-aware creatures on Earth, are a mistake, an aberration, a miscalculation, a screw up, a fluke, an evolutionary faux-pa, a squinch in a world created for some other purpose, a destructive byproduct, a side effect?  What if rational thought is just an implied space, a side effect of something useful that is in itself destructive and/or counterproductive, an experiment gone badly, if you will?  What if the real purpose of existence is the balance of all life on Earth?  And what if it can only be recovered once all humans are gone?

What if we cannot know if something is true?  How would we know that we do not know and even cannot know truth?  What if truth is more or maybe less than just congruence between what we think and what we experience?  If we can know truth, how would we know that we do know truth?  If facts are true, are there truths that are not facts, subjective truths?  What if it does not matter if we know truth?  What if it does not matter what we believe?  What if it does not matter what we have faith in?


It is one thing to believe in or have faith in something that you know to exist, like “I believe the sun will rise tomorrow”.  But having faith in the absurd; in that which you cannot know to be true, cannot experience, cannot prove, is quite another thing.

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

One of Ten

"There are perhaps ten people who have the patience to read what I have expounded above, and scarcely one man in the kingdom who would take the trouble to compose anything like it; which last, however, in one way consoles me, for if everybody can do it, if the work is mere routine, contract-writing by the sheet, then it becomes precisely my merit to have done what all can do (this is the humiliating feature of it for the weak human heart), but which no one else cares to do." Soren Kierkegaard CONCLUDING UNSCIENTIFIC POSTSCRIPT TO THE "PHILOSOPHICAL FRAGMENTS"

Thursday, March 6, 2014

Faith in the Absurd is Comforting

Believing in an omniscient, ever present being makes life easier.  Belief; steadfast, ever-present belief in god, is a subjective and unchangeable focal point that calms.  This focal point does not vary.  It does not change. It is the constant that can always be counted on.  Without this focal point, life is precarious, unstable, out of control.  Without this subjective focal point there is much to fear.  All can be lost in an instant.  Everything of value, everyone you hold dear can be taken from you without recompense.  In an instant you can be abandoned, alone without subjective faith.

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

Why Does Good Always Win?

Good people and the ‘good’ societies/cultures/communities, they make up, treat other good people as they wish to be treated.  This good relationship is the foundation for the community.  One outcome of giving others the respect they deserve is that it makes it more likely the respected people will do as asked without their compliance being dependent upon coercion.  An additional benefit to being good to others within your group is that it adds to the cohesiveness of the group.  Cohesive members of a good community are easily motivated, with honest facts, to the support of a good cause.

If you lead as though others are replaceable objects or non-rational animals; beasts, if you will, your followers will only do what you want so long as they believe doing so affords them an advantage.  Dehumanized subjects will not do as you ask for altruistic reasons.  They may carry out your orders for a bribe or maybe they will do what you want just for the payment of services rendered.  Once you run out of rewards, people who feel objectified and/or disrespected (you are not treating them as you expect to be treated) have no further reason to do as you demand.  The same goes for trading their work or goods for promises of power or valuable objects, they will only trade their services or goods for what you can deliver not just what you promise.

The advantage objectified people see, in doing what you want, may be their continued good health; you may be able to threaten them or their loved ones with social ridicule, unacceptable levels of anxiety, injury, or death, to get them to comply with your wishes.  But if they find a more powerful overlord they no longer have a reason to do as you ask and they may even exact retribution for the threatened or actual harm you have done them.
Oppressed people may find incentive to do as you demand in the form of a common threat you make them aware of.  The threat can be either real or something you have imagined, and if all you have to control them is this threat, once the threat no longer exists, either because a real threat has been overcome or because a fictitious threat has been revealed as existing only in your mind, your coerced underlings will move on.

A group motivated by coercion often takes the initial advantage because it is quicker to buy or bully followers into supporting a cause then it is to gather followers through the spread of true information and good will.  But coerced groups are unstable and fall apart as soon as the perceived benefit is gone or the leader is removed.

Coerced groups are very expensive to maintain, consuming far more resources than a group of altruistic, true believers.  A group built on truth and mutual respect is stable and can easily grow with little cost. A group built on lies and coercion, misrepresented facts or fantasy, is impossible to maintain for long without a huge outpouring of resources.
Bribes, threats, lies, punishments all can coerce people into action but they cannot buy ongoing, altruistic loyalty the way truth and respect does.  Negative treatment cannot induce the altruistic sacrifice of one’s life.  Against a coerced group that has a temporary advantage, the fight of the ‘good’ people for their ‘good’ cause, can prevail even if their numbers never reach the level of their foes because the good people will willingly fight to their death in support of the truth.

If the leader of a coerced group is removed the next in line will be difficult to select because the old leader’s ideology will become fragmented as the old ideology is reinterpreted by others and the new rules are made clear by the new leaders.  Once the old leader is gone the group will break off into small factions and those factions will go their own way.  On the other hand, who the leader of the true believers is, to a certain extent, is inconsequential.  The group is not fulfilling the leader’s goals; the leader is helping the group to fulfill their goals, regardless of what the leader may want.  True believers merely need an individual to organize the cause and in fact there may be no individual leader of the true believers.  There may just be a group of people chosen for their individual skills that guides the group to its goal.

There has never been and can never be a large, cohesive, and homogeneous group that is based upon class, gender, race, religious belief, economic standing or regional affiliation.  There will always be outliers, dissenters, egomaniacs and people who merely feel marginalized by the leaders.  There will always be people who do not fully support the ruling members of these artificially defined groups.  And if these outliers are forcibly removed, others, who were marginally aligned with the ruling class but now question that alignment, will also leave.  They saw value in the people who were removed and they will shy away from the powerful because of their act of violence against people who some believe have done nothing to deserve such harsh treatment.  As the ruling class becomes more cohesive this shedding of marginal members will continue until there is a full-fledged revolt or the ruling class may become the minority and then they can be removed or made irrelevant by the new power elite.

The only principles that will never disappear are those built on facts and the humane treatment of one person for another.  And to the extent that respect for each individual is extended to all of humanity the group following these principles will grow and prosper.  Think of it this way, if you belonged to a powerful group and the leader killed or at the very least, censured or banished someone that you felt close to.  Someone you knew was basically a good person, would you feel safe?  Wouldn’t you feel like you were also in danger of exclusion?  Would you follow or even want to belong to this group when you have every reason to believe that you could be next to be purged?  When one group of people or the leader of a group treats a good person as an object, it threatens everyone in the group, and no one can feel safe.

There are present-day examples of societies built on fear, like North Korea.  It is a totalitarian state where even the relatives of the leader are not safe.  And there are other examples of the abuse of good people, such as the LGBT community in Russia, India and Uganda, where they can be imprisoned or killed for their sexual orientation, or even their support of the LGBT community, it’s the law.  There are other examples of abuse in the Far East, Middle East and Africa, where women and female children are oppressed, abused, mutilated and murdered, legally, it’s the law.

My point isn’t that there are no, nor have never been any, abuses of human rights, or even that today, there are none in our country, I’m not so naïve as to believe that or that there will ever be a time when all individuals treat others inhumanly.  I am trying to build a case for the eventual demise of all inhumane leaders, groups and societies.  Slowly, very slowly, the oppression of minority beliefs, individuals and groups is withering under the global scrutiny of those who treat all humans with dignity, who treat all humans as they, themselves wish to be treated and then expect just treatment for others in return.  In this day of instantaneous, global, electronic media; local, abusive laws, rules and customs are coming under review by the free world and the oppressed are gaining recognition as people who are not being treated as equals.  The marginalized people within these communities are seeing that there is a path to freedom from oppression because they see others being respected and they are speaking out against their inhumane treatment and that of their fellow citizens.

When I treat you as I wish to be treated I give hope to every oppressed person who observes my actions.  And when the oppressed see my actions they begin to believe that they too deserve, and can someday get, respect and the opportunity to live in peace.  When our leaders speak out against inhumane treatment and support equal treatment for all, they give hope to all the oppressed who hear their voice.  And those oppressed people will fight for equal treatment for themselves and more importantly they will fight for equal treatment for their children and grandchildren.

The global expectation of equal treatment for all will come.  Not today or tomorrow, not this year or next year.  I do not expect it in my lifetime or my children’s lifetime or even during the lifetime of my grandchildren.  But humane treatment for all will come.  Before this happens many people will be imprisoned.  Many people will die.  Many people will be tortured.  Many, many people will be abused.  But this inhumane treatment does not go unnoticed and in the end, the good people who treat others with respect will win the ultimate battle as they always have won the lesser.  And in this new era where the humane treatment for all is expected and enforced, attempts to start new, abusive cultures, where one group treats another as objects, will not and cannot come into being, from the ashes of the old.

Everyone who reads this knows the qualities attributed to the angles from above.  And most have been asked to respond to the ‘angles of their better nature’ if not by Lincoln then by someone.  This means you become a calm, joyful person, who turns to the person next to you and then you treat them as you wish to be treated.  This is all it takes to be a good person.  It is simple, but it is not easy.

All life is not sacred.  Cows are not sacred.  Trees are not sacred.  But your life must be sacred, to you.  A person who respects their own life is powerful.  The relationships you make and maintain ARE sacred and stronger than any bonds that are coerced.

If you want to protect a tree from being removed climb it and live in it.  Your relationship to that tree demands it.  If you find a stray and you want to save its life.  Do so, and have a relationship with that stray that demands that you now honor your relationship.  If you go to war and you want to save the person next to you even though it puts your life in danger of paying the ultimate sacrifice, do so, how you feel about yourself demands it.  We must honor our own life and what we choose to do with it but we can’t impose our life’s needs on others.  Each of us must find the best use for our time on earth.


Good people always win, because they have mutually observed, sacred bonds with others.  Bonds built on trust and value.  Value your life.  Value the life of those around you and you will be on the side of the good.  And you will help good win.  If you break sacred bonds you will be alone.  No one will trust you.  And you will be lost.